There are two articles come into my mind today, while Greece (and other countries) v. trioka (i.e EC, ECB, and IMF)
Austerity v. Europe by Javier Solana
Does Austerity promote economic growth? by Robert Schiller
Debt should not be accumulated to a sky-racketing level, that is for sure. Not every country in the world enjoy the privilege of such borrowing power as U.S. However, austerity promoted so hard recently should not be the single solution as well.
In article of Javier Solana, he mentioned of the Great Depression period, while austerity arguably became the major killer of economy. In Schiller's article, he cited a early Dutch-born English philosopher's poem, suggesting the possible further shrinkage of consumption and employment in EURO-zone.
Yet, the next questions would be, what's the alternative?
1. Austerity + QE..that is what they are doing now, yet as I point out in another article, QE may not help the flow of money into the manufacturing sector, but only to finance and government sectors. (and who knows how these government sectors gotta spend???)
2. Austerity + Fiscal policy regulation (by a particular commission in EU structure): This is something under discussion. Should they create a commission "especially" for Greece? or if they apply to all member states, will France fall under the next prey?
3. No Austerity but structural reform: including a board-based pension cut, job stimulus package and tax-incentives for entrepreneurship: which makes more new firms and create more jobs?
4. ??????
By the way, as Javier Solana happens to serve in PSOE government as a Foreign Minister, he might have more sympathy with what PSOE did before. Yet, honestly, in terms of budget balance, PSOE actually did a great job. The Spanish government deficit was turn positive under PSOE hands, and then remained so until 2007, when they tried to use stimulus to be against economic recession.
Oh, a very interesting paper by Brender and Brazen comes to my notice. (They are from bank of Israel and U Maryland, respectively). They study the expansionary policy (i.e. huge government spending project) and re-election probability. It does not help, or even lower, the probability of incumbent to be reelected. Sorry, PSOE, you should learn this earlier.
Discover the beauty in the world through lens of Economics and Finance, with small touches in Sports.
Search This Blog
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
穩懋(3105)縮短設備折舊年限 明年EPS少5毛 嚇跑砷化鎵買盤! 鉅亨網 (Dec. 22, 2012) 折舊費用, 有這麼可怕?少五毛,投資人就要大幅度賣出懲罰*? 問題到底出在哪裡? A) 學會計的好狡猾在操縱盈餘 B) 我們應該來拆解一下看一下現金流量....
-
大家羨慕著中國的發展,認為某種程度上,是計畫經濟與自由經濟混合體的一個偉大成就:一個詞彙就得到了新的關注: " State Capitalism: 國家資本主義 " 這對於台灣人應該一點也不陌生。早期在公有機構的扶持下,也成就了許多卓越的企業(台積電與聯電...
-
在台灣的各位,通常會感受到韓國的競爭壓力。主流媒體上雖然經常比較兩個國家,但流於表象。疏忽了韓國在金融危機後,整體的 行政機器 改造。 這篇文章的重點是在於行政機器的改在套用在貿易協定的簽訂以及發展的歷程。 美國智庫布魯金斯學會(Brookings Institutio...
No comments:
Post a Comment